June 5, 2007
Egregious usage of God
Eduardo Pontaoe
5 June 2007
Mr. Orlando Toledano:
Well, you made it clear clearer than the rays of the sun rising from the east. Giving these religious embellishments to the people even when the intention is honorable, Rachel Arenas committed election infractions according to the election code. It was a blatant disregard of the law under cover of Catholicism’s fervor. Chicken feed compared the money she thrown around like pancakes.
But what bugged me, was Eva Visperas’ claim of the Arenases that invoking the name of God in time of political peril helped in winning a very narrow election. If so, Rachel Arenas prevailing over Tulagan by 617 votes and of Soriano by 1000 votes was initiated by God?
Looking at the implications, God would be so prejudiced against Tulagan and Soriano. On the flip of the coin, it is possible that Tulagan and Soriano prayed like hell, too, asking God to go in their favors. Does it mean to say, Rachel Arenas is closer to God than the rest of them?
It is that puissant. . .the mostest, in an egregious usage of God since Moses. Rachel Arenas winning is an act of the people. . .not God’s. . .because they decided to give her a shot.
She won when 1617 believers cast their ballots more than the others not where he graduated or who she is but her beauty in articulating a true lover of the masses. A ploy? It remains to be seen on how she will perform her service. Or, she could be in the same bandwagon of incessant corruption.
However, it can be believed, this is only the beginning for an ambitious mother crafting for a daughter whose ambitions will end up in Malacanang. For this, we had seen nothing yet from a foxy Baby Arenas on what she would do for her daughter.
True to form - the adage - God and the Church are refuge of scoundrels!





